Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^ and one of them is a woman who has been identified off here but I won’t dox anyone. She spends time on Reddit too. She is obsessed with freedman. No one else cares much about lawyers but she drools over him. [/quote]

She has ruined this thread. [/quote]

It's totally exhausting. [/quote]

I don't want to report them as to not annoy Jeff, but they need to socially pressured to stop spamming about their Freedman obsession.[/quote]

Freedman has made himself a huge part of this case. Because of his antics, Gottlieb is subpoenaing the Freedman law firm to uncover additional information about the smear.  His communications with content creators are all being subpoenaed to be studied as part of the smear. Are we not supposed to talk about this, really?

Do you understand how unusual it is for a law firm itself, and specifically the lead attorney like Freedman on a case, to be involved in discovery for issues of wrongdoing?

I’m sorry that this lawyer’s potentially bad actions in this case are ruining your story about poor, poor, poor Justin Baldoni and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad Blake Lively.  It would be lovely for you if Freedman’s behavior in this case was off limits so you could go back to posting 24/7 cringe interviews Lively gave fifteen years ago.

But Bryan Freedman has made himself a part of this case and as long as that’s true I and other people here are going to keep talking about it. [/quote]

Entanglements in cases are not that uncommon. What is uncommon is for the public to be so obsessed with the lawyers in a case. I’m a lawyer who tends to pay attention to who the lawyers are, and even I don’t care much about any of the firms, never mind the individual lawyers. You obsess all day long on here, and Reddit. 
You’re just clearly being paid to try to take the heat off lively by focusing on random other nonsense (I remember your protective order obsession all too well) or you’re just nuts with some weird personal obsession or vendetta against Freedman (were you a paralegal he fired? A scorned love interest?).

Anyway, blather away as always. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics