Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "GA Case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If the plaintiffs attorneys think Wade isn’t qualified to prosecute felonies, why do they want him removed? He’s done pretty well so far with grand jury indictments, guilty pleas, and defeating plaintiffs’ motions to try to move their cases, claim executive privilege, etc. [/quote] +1. If he’s such a bad lawyer, you’d think they’d want to keep him on the case. The intense focus on getting rid of him suggests that he’s been quite effective.[/quote] Conflict of interest. Go look it up. Not everything in life is about gaining advantage or unfair advantage.[/quote] DP. Complaining that he is inexperienced is not about a conflict of interest. It's an objectively strange complaint from a defense attorney.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
