Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] The latter is a complete smack down of Jones’ request for attorneys fees, which among other things, had to be filed in state court.[/quote] I saw that and was surprised, because I wouldn't expect them to make that kind of mistake, so we'll see what the response is (not something I'm interested in researching, lol). I do think they made a pretty good substantive argument that this wasn't a bad faith lawsuit, just failure to state a claim. Ryan Reynolds I think will have the same problem... calling someone a sexual predator to their agent is the type of thing that gets you sued (I agreed with dismissal for lack of actual malice but that doesn't necessarily make the lawsuit frivolous). Blake really does stand the best chance of winning attorney's fees on the premise that all her allegedly defamatory statements were contained in a CRD claim that become the basis of a lawsuit. And that will really infuriate people if Liman rules for her, plus it could invoke the constitutionality of 47.1 so that will create a lot of fireworks. I almost wonder if they've coordinated for Sloane to go first so they can correct any technical mistakes her lawyers made her, but that kind of sucks for her, and they have different representation so not sure why she would do that.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics