Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]WF submitted responsive briefs to both the motion to extend discovery and Jones motion for attorney’s fees (both readily available on Reddit). WF has stepped up its game with respect to brief writing. The first doesn’t object to the extension, but notes the failures of Livelt and Jones to actually notice depositions, their attempts to postpone their own depositions and points out that there is only 150 hours of video footage, not 50,000, none of which should be required viewing for Blake prior to her depo. The latter is a complete smack down of Jones’ request for attorneys fees, which among other things, had to be filed in state court.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
