Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]haha, Judge Liman denied Wallace's request for a protective order over the identity of his clients, saying that's what the protective order was for. Which I said in here pages ago, but Baldoni supporters laughed at me. lolol. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.390.0.pdf[/quote] Once again, your recounting of events is ahistorical. I don't remember anyone here doing that. Yet you always love claiming, "Ha, I said this about the lawsuit, but then Justin supporters said THAT," and we're just like, no, that's not a thing that happened. [/quote] I don’t think this motion was even discussed on this thread.[/quote] Just another case of Baldoni supporters believing whatever tf they want to despite the actual facts, as already discussed on the last page. Very on brand. [/quote] You frequently confuse threads here with threads on Reddit, one can only guess as to why.[/quote] The person who discussed this issue with me here is discussing it more in the comment above this, and also discussed the discussion on the page before this. Try to keep up if you can. I can hear myself being annoying rn, but I don’t care because I can also hear you being annoying. 🤷♀️ [/quote] That one person is not a Baldoni supporter and is literally one person. The motion was barely mentioned on this thread. So once again, living in your own reality.[/quote] It’s not my problem if you can’t be bothered to weigh in on the filings that get discussed here. Some of us did (and still are) so I feel pretty good about my reality, especially as compared to the reality of Baldoni supporters who thought their boy had $400M+ in claims which went *poof* overnight because Bryan Freedman prefers threatening and bullying people over the actual hard work of research and writing that go into drafting a legitimate legal complaint. So if we are comparing realities that are built on ineffable hopes and dreams that dissipate completely when the truth comes along, I feel pretty good about mine, thanks.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics