Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Aaaand the CA judge has transferred the issue of the Motion to Quash the subpoena on the Liner Freedman firm back to SDNY with Liman, saying essentially he has already ruled on a number of other third party discovery motions and that any ruling from CA here could get in the way of and/or conflict with those and other discovery rulings.  https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.974420/gov.uscourts.cacd.974420.20.0.pdf

I will say again that I don't really think transferring this to Liman really helps Lively; Liman has been careful to say so far that this is not a case against the lawyers, and he did not want to get involved in prohibiting Freedman from taking Lively's deposition.  Maybe things will be slightly different here where, to some degree, Gottlieb has provided some evidence that the actual law firm has been involved in the mechanism of the smear (and reportedly Freedman has a close relationship with many LA judges and makes monetary contributions to their election campaigns, so maybe even if Liman isn't a great option, he's still a better choice than LA ha).  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics