Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Look. Putting a pool in a public park has consequences. Why does every concern get knocked down as hyperbole? 1. It will only be open three months a year, six days a week, eight hours a day. 2. DC won't maintain it. 3. It will destroy the vistas in the currently mature natural park 4. It will cost $12 million[/quote] 5. It likely will result in a significantly smaller playing field. 6. One or more of the tennis courts will be lost. 7. Under basically all of DPR's alternatives, there will be major impact to, and likely removal of, the large oak trees because the pool (without the surrounding infrastructure shown on the plans) is placed very close to them. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
