Reply to GA Case

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "GA Case"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LOL.  She's guilty as sin.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/megynkelly/status/1746655535816966442[/twitter][/quote]

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout.  However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor?  Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal.  Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.[/quote]

Defense?  There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules?  Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it.  Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.  [/quote]

+1.  All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance.  So what?  Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal. [/quote]

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations[/quote]

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.[/quote]

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony.  So, yes, it is a "real issue".[/quote]

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony.  Is it ethically questionable?  Sometimes.  Illegal?  Nope.[/quote]

DP
SHE approved his compensation. 
SHE hired him without approval.  [/quote]

Yeah.  His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.  [/quote]

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets.  I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.  [/quote]

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes? [/quote]

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/

Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/[/quote]

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously. [/quote]

He's never prosecuted a felony. Ever. Much less dealt with an unprecedented case against a former president.

There's a reason you are resorting to innuendo and insults. If his background were quite obviously a plus, you'd highlight it. But like his employer, you are skirting it. [/quote]

I’m sorry, but you guys just keep making up crap, and expecting me to believe it. This is not innuendo. This is not an insult. It’s factual: you are not believable.

You’ve heard of the boy who cried wolf? You’re going to defend the parking tickets claim, and now the goal post is he hasn’t prosecuted a felony? I’ll wait on the court docs. I’m not chasing down anymore of your bullshit claims. Get back to your Twitter and Facebook memes. [/quote]

It has been widely reported that his experience is, ahem, more than questionable when it comes to prosecuting this case.

From Politico:
"Merchant wrote in her motion that she can find no evidence that Wade, whose law firm website promotes his experience in civil litigation, including car accident and family law cases, has ever prosecuted a felony case. She questioned his qualifications to try this case."
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/14/da-defends-prosecutor-trump-georgia-election-case-00135549

So, Merchant is the attorney representing the plaintiff.  If there is indeed evidence of him prosecuting a felony case, you would think he, or Fani, or even a sympathetic media group like MSNBC would have found it and presented it at this point.  But, crickets.

There is plenty to investigate here when it comes to Fani Willis.  [/quote]

The MAGA attorneys have proven again and again that they’re willing to lie to the court, so if that’s your only proof, it’s not convincing to me. You go ahead and be gullible enough to believe them. I’ll wait on filings from people who don’t lie to the court. [/quote]

It's reasonable to withhold judgment and wait on the filings. It's less reasonable to declare the allegations are BS when there are indications that it is possibly true. [/quote]

The allegations are a spaghetti filing, throw anything and everything at the wall and see what sticks.

That's not an indication of merit, just the opposite.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics