Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Unpopular opinion. The Vanzan issue is far more interesting and important than the main case. I think most reasonable people would agree at this point that Blake’s SH claims don’t meet the legal definition of SH. She’s focused on retaliation but good luck proving 1. A smear campaign existed, and 2. the proximate cause was her SH claim and not putting him in the basement, taking his face off the poster, and being a generally horrible person. That’s a long way to say you couldn’t pay me to care about Blake’s SH claims at this point. There are far more worthy causes and plaintiffs to get behind.

Now Vanzan on the other hand. Oh I’m definitely locked in. As an American, the idea that my privacy rights could be so easily and flagrantly violated is a huge problem for me, huge. Separate and apart from the main case, I think a lot of us need to see the system work here and need to see something done about this. [/quote]

You make some good points.

It’s ironic that the pro BL poster on here is obsessed with making everyone believe Freedman is corrupt. Or obvious I suppose [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics