Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And once again, ZERO accountability from Baldoni supporters re the absolutely deceptive way Garofalo wrote this motion.  You guys are the best, and by the best I totally mean the worst.  You should not wonder why you keep losing. It is because of stuff like this, apparently second nature to lawyers at Liner Freedman.  Throwing up in my mouth a little. [/quote]

What is there to be accountable for? Am I Garofalo's mommy?[/quote]

Seriously.  In any case, there is nothing wrong with the motion.  Lively denies she and Van Zan are the same party.  Van Zan has produced nothing.  Lively produced without metadata (ironically after arguing successfully that metadata had to be included in the TAG production).  Van Zan must have the originals, or needs to state for the record they do not.

[b]Frankly, the Blake supporter owes us all an apology for spamming us with such obvious bullshit.[/quote][/b]

DP totally agree but haven’t we learned by now? This totally organic (sarcasm) lively supporter goes nuts spamming this thread with crap, often to distract from a legitimately bad issue arising on Blake’s side… like the fact that it seems there is no a separate witness who was intimidated to mislead/lie/delete evidence. And of course that’s separate from the entire fraud Van Zan litigation.

But no, they’d like us to believe the real bad actors are Freedman because he ‘lied’ when he didn’t file an amended complaint (like he owes the public anything, and doesn’t take direction from his client) and Garafoala bc she asked for metadata. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics