Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And once again, ZERO accountability from Baldoni supporters re the absolutely deceptive way Garofalo wrote this motion. You guys are the best, and by the best I totally mean the worst. You should not wonder why you keep losing. It is because of stuff like this, apparently second nature to lawyers at Liner Freedman. Throwing up in my mouth a little. [/quote] What is there to be accountable for? Am I Garofalo's mommy?[/quote] Seriously. In any case, there is nothing wrong with the motion. Lively denies she and Van Zan are the same party. Van Zan has produced nothing. Lively produced without metadata (ironically after arguing successfully that metadata had to be included in the TAG production). Van Zan must have the originals, or needs to state for the record they do not. Frankly, the Blake supporter owes us all an apology for spamming us with such obvious bullshit.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics