Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Who did you think killed JonBenet?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The one thing I can't wrap my head around is the violation with the paint brush. Sure, stage everything else but why that? It makes no sense at all.[/quote] The intent of the staging was to cover up what their son did. The violation with the paint brush, the complicated knots, the strangulation would not be something that a 9 year old kid would do. This wasn't a sex crime. This was an inadvertent death staged to look like a sex crime.[/quote] I like this guys theory: https://m.reddit.com/r/JonBenet/comments/52xuoh/jonbenet_extensive_bdi_theory_garrotte_used_to/?utm_source=mweb_redirect&compact=false[/quote] I think it's an interesting theory. I only have a few issues with it: -If JB was struck with the flashlight by Burke, wouldn't they have removed it from the kitchen counter? In the crime scene photos, that giant mag light is sitting out in the kitchen, plain as day. If John and Patsy went to that much trouble to stage the crime, they would remove the murder weapon from the main area people congregate. Why bother wiping it down and then leave it out? -I still don't see them using the garrote on their daughter. It is so heinous to imagine them strangling their own child with this weapon that is effectively used to torture and execute people. Surely they could've used something less barbaric. That garrote was pulled so tight and her neck was so red and purple from those ligature marks. I just can't see them doing that to her if this was a cover-up for an accident. The sexual assault with the paint brush I don't get either. -I'm not sure of the timing of this reddit guy's theory but seems the parents would've had time to remove the body and bury her somewhere. That would've left far less evidence than keeping her in the basement. Surely burying her somewhere would be more humane than sexually assaulting her and tying a garrote around her neck. [/quote] Just guesses but: The flashlight had no trace of prints not even on the button to turn it on.. it was clearly wiped down including the batteries. It could've been forgotten in the riush of things. It was a gift from John andrew to John. So it was not brought in by an intruder. They most likely thought she was dead already at that point and the discoloration is likely from Fluid buildup post mortem. Remember their goal was to make it seem real and legit to protect Burke and throw off the trail to him. They risked being seen by neighbors or surveillance cameras from stores and the like had they gone out and returned. Think about it --if they cal the police to say there had been a kidnapping but there was evidence that their vehicles had been moved it would've been investigated and obvious. They were left with no choice but to leave her in the home. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics