Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Valor"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone go to 2012 boys tryouts? What's the opinion of the club in this age group? I have a 2012 boy who was on the lower field of play, we're coming from CYA rec.[/quote] My understanding is most of the current 2012 Silver team (the lowest team) was a CYA rec team (maybe a CYA all star team) and the coach was the rec coach. I have also heard that team is actually better than the 3rd team but that was from a silver parent. I guess that 4th team is now the black team. So they have four teams, it should be easy to get a spot but not sure a spot you want. [/quote] Yes - the talent gap between the top 2 teams and the bottom 2 teams is pretty wide. The silver team (4th team/future black team) is I would say almost equal to the 3rd team but a long way from the 2nd team and longer way to the top team (current gold/next year ecnl-r). The fourth team plays in the lowest NCSL division but has a chance at promotion. Someone posted a link to the NCSL schedule/results in the last few pages of this thread.[/quote] Pretty typical. The tryouts at this club are a joke. They already know who is going to be on the number 1 and 2 teams. -Lots of nepotism. Good luck folks if you haven't already been preparing to make a move. -If Valor is going to make more than 3 teams, your changing age groups, it's likely that 4th or 5th teams will never be in a higher level of play or division. -I'd ask about how well their 4th and 5th teams did. Lots of smoke and mirrors. [/quote] No one expects the 4th and 5th level teams to do well. I mean, come on. They are developmental. [/quote] Wow. I hope you're not Coach. I guess why parents should spend the money for a non-developmental program. Are you saying, based on low expectations for development its best to stay away from 4th and 5th teams? [/quote] Nobody should be paying 1st/2nd team prices for 3rd teams or beyond, nor should clubs really push that but thats not the reality of club soccer in America as a business. If a kid gets an offer for the 3rd team or beyond anywhere, rec soccer is likely a better option.[/quote] But if they are paying $3000 and Team 1 kid is paying $3000, shouldn't they be hiring and paying the same level coaches for both groups? [/quote] There aren't enough qualified individuals to fill that many coaching positions, nor is there pathway for individuals to get credentials easily at a low cost.[/quote] If you pay enough, you can attract good coaches. I don't know how they seem able to fill the jobs for the higher teams with qualified coaches but not the lower teams. They should charge less for teams that get less. [/quote] Mmm yes please email them this and every club in the area and see the response you get back. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics