Reply to Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can you not see the difference between a [b]candidate doing opposition research[/b] and the president of the United States using the power of his office to solicit a criminal investigation of a political opponent from a foreign government?[/quote]

Some of them can, some of them can't.  But either way, they'd prefer to troll than to admit it.  [/quote]

Ok, so if the Clinton campaign's "opposition research" via the foreign sourced dossier is not a big deal, then why the investigation into the Trump campaign's so called "collusion"?[/quote]

Difference between illegally asking a foreign country for help and a company legally paying another company for services.[/quote]

What foreign country did the Trump campaign ask for help?[/quote]

Russia, if you are listening, and poof, within hours, a hack was made.

But since you asked, he also had help from Israel, Saudi Arabia and UAE.[/quote]

So if the Trump campaign [u]illegally[/u] asked all four of these countries for help, why did the 2 year long Mueller investigation not come to that conclusion?[/quote]
These most recent allegations are just that, RECENT. we no longer need to guess how emboldened the president became after he managed to barely scoot past Mueller. [b]And don’t forget that the report DIDN’T exonerate him[/b]. It just left it up to Congress. So.... we know how that went.[/quote]

From the Muller report:  “investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”
 [/quote]

You selectively copied that and you left off the second part of the statement.

Here's something in full
“[I]f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics