Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Here’s a nice summary courtesy of Reddit 1. In the example provided, lively herself admits in her May 16th email to wayfarer that the subpoena from Jones was INCOMPLETE. There were missing attachments and missing metadata. Hence, why freedman needs to go to the source to obtain EVERYTHING that was included 2. They also want to cross reference subpoenas. Why is jones handing over a subpoena that is missing attachments? It’s not fair that wayfarer only gets to look at a peak and not the entire thing. 3. Wayfarers lawyers are also asking for additional documents outside of what was provided in this May 16 email. Why you ask? Well VANZAN issued a subpoena for breach of contract, despite Abel and Jonesworks never having a contract with VANZAN, and not being named in the active case of DOES 1-10. So, what does VANZAN know that Abel and Jones don’t, since they’ve never been in contact with one another[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
