Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Aaaand Lively's reps have now released a statement to PEOPLE about the lack of amendment: "The Court dismissed the frivolous $400 million Baldoni-Wayfarer lawsuit in its entirety. In the days that followed, Baldoni's lawyer said the judge's decision to dismiss their case was not a big deal as they promised to amend and refile it. As per usual, that was not true. The Court's dismissal of Baldoni's sham lawsuit was a total victory after all." Yup. Spot on.[/quote] Dp. I think it’s funny to claim ‘total victory’ when Blake has her claims out there and hasn’t proven a thing and in fact there is copious evidence that she lied through her teeth [/quote] Here, it’s Freedman who had lied about the dismissal not being a big deal at all because they would refile. Since he never did refile, and every single one of Baldoni’s claims has been dismissed, the dismissal actually was a pretty big deal despite Freedman’s lies to minimize it. Zero remaining claims does mean total victory against Baldoni’s claims. [/quote] Are you 12? I thought you claimed to be a litigator? Freedman and any other lawyer representing his client is not required to tell the public his legal strategy, nor is he required to not makd adjustments when he/his client feels they are warranted. It is not a ‘lie’ for them to make strategy changes. You need to grow up. You’re such a petty little snowflake. [/quote] You Baldoni supporters are going to defend every dumb mistake Freedman makes right to the end. It’s not a “strategy change” to get on tv and say “of course we are going to file an amended complaint” and then fail to file that complaint. That’s actually just a lie. Here’s what would not have been a lie, since you and Freedman seem to need the help in telling lies from not lies: when you don’t yet know what will happen, get on tv and say you are “looking at the issue and considering the best options.” That is totally not a lie then! I know, it’s actually that simple. I’m not sure you see how easy it is not to lie to your own supporters, so I hope this helps you and Freedman figure that out![/quote] Again a lot of allegations from lying from the person supporting the parties that filed sham litigation to get early access to documents. I don’t care about the amended complaint because the defamation claim was the main one. I’m also going to wait a few weeks and see what, if any, other legal measures are taken. This isn’t a reality show and we aren’t owed 24/7 updates on this litigation.[/quote] Look, just tell that to your guy, not to me. “You don’t need to get on TV and announce a plan after every major event!” I almost noted that in my response above but I thought it was too obvious. However, if Freedman *does* get on TV and announce a plan, and then proceeds to do the exact opposite of that plan, it is appropriate to call his announcement on TV a lie. Words have meaning and saying you will do one thing and then doing NOT that thing is lying. 🤷♀️ [/quote] I don't like Freedman but not necessarily a lie. It appears he read the decision wrong and at first thought it included the tortious interference with economic advantage when in fact it was just the contract claims and the contracts likely do not support the claims. Sounds like he eventually conferred with his team and realized it wasn't worth it. Fair to say it was another example of him promising and not delivering. The statement from yesterday about generically looking at all the options was good. He simply should have made a statement like that the day of the decision instead of grandstanding. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics