Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]This is exactly why people don’t trust the process—and you don’t have to assume bad intent to see it. If moving Wootton had been under consideration for months, why did the initial Option H not clearly say that—only to be revised 48 hours later once people started asking questions? That’s a transparency problem, plain and simple. Then you roll it out in early December, move quickly through the holidays, and limit the window for meaningful analysis or alternatives. At that point, it’s not just “imperfect process”—it looks like a process designed to move one outcome forward quickly. And yes, MCPS collected input. But collecting input isn’t the same as letting it influence the result. When a decision this big moves forward with no meaningful change despite significant pushback, it’s completely reasonable for people to conclude the outcome was effectively decided in advance.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
