Reply to Massive home addition causes confusion in Fairfax County neighborhood

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Massive home addition causes confusion in Fairfax County neighborhood"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It looks like Courtney has her backyard shed in the setback. In two, actually. Maybe she thought they should cancel each other out. Will one of you tell her?[/quote]

So we’re back to the verging-on-creepy posts about the neighbor again, I see. 
[/quote]

She went on TV and had a helicopter fly over her house. [/quote]

And?

Does asking questions about something happening in one’s neighborhood give others the right to make creepy comments about the person?

You gotta wonder if comments like this would be made if a man had asked these questions.

[/quote]

How is it creepy? Should have I instead gone on Facebook and posted the address? Then went to the media to have them take pictures of her house? Because that's somehow less creepy?

Yeah, it does make you wonder how this would have gone down if Mike was a woman and Courtney was a man.

Every setback is sacred,
Every setback is great!
If you’re six inches over,
You’ve committed a grave mistake![/quote]

I suggest you open a complaint with the zoning authority in Fairfax County. It's online. The shed might even be unpermitted. [/quote]

This happened with a neighbor on my street. Another neighbor reported them. The county sent out notices to our whole block that there would be a hearing where we could state our concerns about the shed. The neighbor who reported it said they were against it, but all the other neighbors who came to the hearing were fine with it. The board gave them a variance for the shed.

Apparently this is fairly common and as long as most of the neighbors are okay with it, the allow it. 
[/quote].

What the neighbors say doesn't have that much of an impact. The neighbors can speak to an adverse impact, but there has to be an adverse impact. And for setback encroachments, impacts will be minimal.[/quote]

We were told that the neighbors views were taken into consideration. The people who complained were the only ones who spoke against it at the hearing, the others who made statements made the points that it was behind the house and can’t be seen from the street, so no adverse impact on anyone. It was also a very nice, attractive shed that had the same architecture as the houses in the neighborhood. 
[/quote]

They are, to the extent they speak to the standards in ordinance. They would need to demonstrate an adverse impact from the requested modification- the setback reduction. Most of the posters here are focused on the size or height, which isn't relevant.[/quote]

The standards for a shed are slightly different, but it’s interesting that the fact that this shed couldn’t be seen from the street and that it blended with the look of the houses in the neighborhood were taken into account. Adverse impact can be related to size and height in terms of whether a building has an effect on others. 
[/quote]

To be clear, it isn't the impact of the building-it is the impact of the setback reduction. [/quote]

The impact of the setback reduction varies with the size and height of the building. A taller or longer building would have more area intruding in to setback than a lower or smaller building.

In addition, an intrusion at the back of a building will have less impact than one that can be seen from the street. 
[/quote]

That's true, but it is only the impact of the difference between the 6 inches that matters.  A bigger/taller building has more of an impact in general, but the difference in impact between those 6 inches is negligible.[/quote]

Well, the reasonable person can differ here. Many people would find that a six inch intrusion has more impact when it is over a longer and/or taller wall area. 
[/quote]

You'd be wrong.

From the neighbor's front door, their back porch, the visual difference in height would be 1% (difference in visual width is less- about 0.85%).

Even going right up to their own setback, the difference in height is only 1.6%.

This is imperceptible. There is no impact.[/quote]

It’s not just the difference to the immediate neighbors, it’s also the difference to how it can be seen from the street and from behind. [/quote]

I'm not sure what you mean. There isn't going to be a difference from that perspective. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you.[/quote]

You’re not misunderstanding. You’re being purposely obtuse. You know full well they mean that from the street that house with the addition is an eyesore to the neighborhood. There is a negative impact to every single house nearby. [/quote]

No, I really don't understand what point they're trying to make there. Moving the house over 6 inches wouldn't change the distance from the street. And from other positions in the neighborhood, the difference from those 6 inches would be even less.

You see to be making a point about the addition regardless of its position from the setback. But the pp seemed to be talking about the impact of the 6 inches.[/quote]

It is going to be at least 12 inches over the line once the gutters and roof overhang are added.[/quote]

I doubt that's true, but even if it is, the addition would be equally objectionable if it were a foot narrower. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics