Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]If I hear one more time: "we are working tirelessly to make decisions that are in the best interest of our players"... If that were really true, ECNL would allow clubs to have time to improve or transition to a new state, not just threatened to remove the entire club from the league. If that were true, clubs would advocate more for their programs and teams. They would also pay attention to what is going on in their teams, evaluate coaches in underperforming teams. What is true is that ECNL and clubs think they are running a business, kids are an afterthought of all their decisions or maybe they don't measure the impact on those young lives. Next year is going to be a gigantic mess, Brave coaches will keep their kids, and VA Union coaches will do the same. Kids will be left on the curb, kids who are in the middle of the delicate recruiting process will now have to wrestle with the unknown. It did not have to be that way but it would have required more effort. I hope people will vote with their feet.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics