Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]But is a pool for 3 months worth losing the tennis courts and fields that our kids depend on year round? Everyone seems to think they can have their cake and eat it too. There is physically no space for a large pool, changing facilities, facilities for pool equipment, tennis courts, baseball fields, soccer fields, etc. And the fact that Cheh and DPR and DGS say it's going to happen despite there being no architectural plan is outrageous. Sure, they say it all coded like "there's no final decision, hint hint, wink wink." Absolute waste of money. [/quote] This is exactly what she said about the new homeless shelter on Idaho Ave. Cheh decides what she wants, and the views of the community be damned. She must really have a hard-on for the people who live on Idaho. First the shelter, then a pool that few neighborhood residents want if it means giving up existing facilities at Hearst Park. But Mary knows best what's good for you.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
