Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "MERLD does exist!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not all kids with ASD need or get ABA. ABA has NEVER been recommended for my DS with ASD/ADHD by anyone. [b] You are right however that speech therapy for a MERLD child will look very different than speech therapy for a child whose deficit is solely pragmatics.[/b] DS attends a language immersion school, Mandarin/English, has excellent language skills and gets pragmatic speech therapy and social skills classes. He would not be in a dual language program if he had issues with receptive and expressive language in English. Also, it is hard to imagine a child who has issues with receptive and expressive language NOT having pragmatic speech issues.[/quote] It may be hard for you to imagine, but the MERLD kids I know do not have pragmatic speech issues. They have expressive issues that may impact social things but its not the same thing as what you are thinking. And, my MERLD kid could do an immersion school, as he's done foreign language at his school for two years/no more issues than other kids. You are very much overgeneralizing and making it based of ADHD/ASD, not a language disorder. [/quote] [b] What is MERLD, then? What do the receptive issues mean - nothing? I understand that a kid with expressive delays only could do that - but how is a kid who cannot understand language having no issues udnerstanding language[/b]? WT everloving F, OP? If there is nothing wrong with your kid, awesome, move along. If there is, join us over here in the land where things are wrong and unpredictable but get off your high horse, for the love of. [/quote] Some of this disagreement seems to be a misunderstanding of the technical terms involved. Receptive language is understanding the vocubulary and grammar of speech. Expressive language is using vocabulary and grammar. Pragmatics is understanding the social and emotional context of language. Each of these is controlled by a different part of the brain that are supposed to work together, but depending on where the miswiring is located, you can have one, two or all three. So a child may have perfect grammar and a large vocabulary, but not understand the difference between friendly teasing and bullying. That would be pragmatics. Or a child may not understand the words another child is using, but understand friendly tones and gestures. That would be receptive. [/quote] Exactly and when there are issues understanding and using vocabulary and grammar, there are pragmatic speech issues. Pragmatic issues can be explained to a child with only pragmatic issues using words but it is a whole other ball game explaining pragmatics if there are receptive issues.[/quote] Your statement makes no sense. Just because a child has receptive issues does not mean they have pragmatic. Most receptive language kids have other coping strategies and learn to function, especially socially. I can explain social things very easily to my child as can others. You missed the point of that comment.[/quote] Really? How do you explain concepts like "humility", "good sportsmanship", "kindness", etc. without using language? Receptive language delays need much more than coping strategies and that is why a receptive language delay is sometimes an indicator for ID.[/quote] Social communication skills are not necessarily dependent on spoken language. Just think about pre-verbal babies, or toddlers with just a few words. Many of them engage in socialization extremely effectively, without any language at all. Conversely, high-functioning ASD kids can have great receptive and expressive language, and still need help with pragmatics. Language is ONE tool to engage in socialization. Not the only one. [/quote] Agree. Social communication isn't just dependent on spoken language. This is why ASD is also often diagnosed as "non-verbal learning disability." While social communication skills are not completely dependent on language. Abstract reasoning ability and IQ tests such as the WISC ARE completely dependent on language. Thus why receptive language issues can also show up as low IQ scores. [/quote] Thus bringing it full circle. [b]Kids whose only deficit is pragmatics can be taught pragmatics using words[/b] - probably the easiest way to teach social skills. Kids with receptive delays require more than words thus therapies like ABA - whether or not the child has an ASD diagnosis.[/quote] FYI, NVLD is no longer in the DSM, PP. This makes no sense PPP. You're confusing pragmatics, social skills, and behavior. Pragmatics is [b]context[/b] pure and simple. You don't teach "using words." You teach it through experience (preferably), social skill groups, picture stories, etc. It's helping a kid learn appropriate responses in context. (Sidetone: I never met a kid whose "only deficit" was pragmatics.) Kids learn social skills best from their peers--that's based on research. ABA or behavioral therapy aren't generally used for teaching social skills; they are for skill building and to address behavioral issues. Not all kids with receptive delays will require "more therapies." It really just depends on the kid and the severity of their delays. I'm not sure where you got this nonsense.[/quote] Kids with ASD need explicit instruction in pragmatics and social skills. They do not learn it from observation, experience and modeling by peers or adults. If they did, they would not have ASD and no one would be running social skills classes and charging parents $$$.[/quote] Well, to burst your bubble social skill class/pragmatics instruction are not just for kids on the spectrum. Not all kids on the spectrum need social skill classes/pragmatics instruction. It really just depends on the kid.[/quote] Autism is a social communication disorder. Whether or not they need pragmatics or social skills instruction, social skills deficits are the main criteria. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics