Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Reaction to "Study of Choice and Special Academic Programs: Report of Findings and Recommendations" "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OK 17:31 what do you propose instead? Here is 3a again: "Recommendation 3a: Implement modifications to the selection process used for academically competitive programs in MCPS, comprising elementary centers for highly gifted students and secondary magnet programs, to focus these programs on selecting equitably from among those applicants that demonstrate a capacity to thrive in the program, that include use of non-cognitive criteria, group-specific norms that benchmark student performance against school peers with comparable backgrounds, and/or a process that offers automatic admissions to the programs for students in the top 5-10% of sending elementary or middle schools in the district." [b]Don't you find the use of the terms "group-specific norms" and "benchmark against school peers with comparable backgrounds" to imply racial/socio-economic profiling?[/b] Also the use of "non-cognitive" criteria The definition of cognition is "the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding". Not sure what a non-cognitive criteria is but to me, ability to acquire knowledge would be a key criteria for an advanced program. Why is it not OK for these kids to be in an advanced program based on their learning abilities on a level playing field. Sports teams are chosen based on ability. To me this is the same thing. Everyone needs to be judged the same. [/quote] No. Admitting on race would be illegal, and I don't know what you mean by "socioeconomic profiling". Yes, everybody should be on a level playing field. But everybody is not currently on a level playing field. So, what can we do to get everybody on a level playing field? By which I don't just mean, get the people who are below grade-level to grade-level. I also mean, get all of the high-ability kids applying to the high-ability programs.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics