Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Reaction to "Study of Choice and Special Academic Programs: Report of Findings and Recommendations" "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][i][quote]Work to address barriers to equitable access in the elementary center program by [b]revising Board Policy IOA to broaden the definition of giftedness [/b]to focus on identifying students who are highly able from all backgrounds [/quote][/i] Bolded is the contentious statement. What does this mean? Most are taking it to mean that they will lower the test score criteria. If that happens, but the test score is still weighed heavily, then it may end up that more Whites/Asians get in rather than the URM. Even if you just take the top performing 3 to 4% of each ES across the board, you *may* find that the top performing kids in a heavily URM school are the few WhiteAsian kids at the school. Then what? Would they want to change the admissions criteria again? [b]How do you "broaden" the criteria for "giftedness" if not by lowering the test scores? [/b][/quote] Do you define "giftedness" simply by test scores? I don't. Also, when you talk about "the URM", which people, specifically, are you talking about?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics