Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Dangerous levels of Radon found in 28 MCPS schools. "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]FYI "A family whose home has radon levels of 4 pCi/l is exposed to approximately 35 times as much radiation as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission would allow if that family was standing next to the fence of a radioactive waste site. (25 mrem limit, 800 mrem exposure) An elementary school student that spends 8 hours per day and 180 days per year in a classroom with 4 pCi/l of radon will receive nearly 10 times as much radiation as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission allows at the edge of a nuclear power plant.(25 mrem limit, 200 mrem exposure) Most U.S. EPA lifetime safety standards for carcinogens are established based on a 1 in 100,000 risk of death. [b]Most scientists agree that the risk of death for radon at 4 pCi/l is approximately 1 in 100. [/b]At the 4 pCi/l EPA action guideline level, radon carries approximately 1000 times the risk of death as any other EPA carcinogen. It is important to note that the action level is not a safe level, as there are no "safe" levels of radon gas." From the Radon Information Ctr http://www.radon.com/radon/radon_facts.html[/quote] That's interesting, because the EPA says that at 4 pCi/l, if 1,000 people who never smoked were exposed to this level over a lifetime, about 7 people could develop lung cancer. I guess that you could say that 7/1,000 is approximately 1/100, but the risk of developing lung cancer is absolutely not the same as the risk of dying from lung cancer, and I think that the "lifetime of exposure" thing is relevant too. But if you want to trust "radon.com" over the EPA, go ahead.[/quote] The survival rate for lung cancer is about 17%. So let's not rely on the difference between getting it and dying of it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics