Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Continue at current school after moving out of boundary?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] By the way,[u] students who are homeless are considered "at risk" and get priority consideration over people with addresses[/u]. Continuity is vital to these kids and they would not be kicked out, nor denied a seat for living somewhere OOB. But you wouldn't know that. [/quote] The new rules did not end feeder rights, and the at-risk preference has not yet been implemented. But you wouldn't know that. [/quote] Actually, I would know that because good friends fostered and then adopted a child who was considered at risk five years ago. The primary objective was to keep this child close to familiar surroundings, facilities and caregivers, and the family had their choice of DCPS and charters that met the objective. I learned quite a bit about the challenges that DCPS faces with these kids and the efforts to give them a baseline normalcy, falling way short of a basic education. The at-risk preference bemoaned by so many in Ward 3 has been in place for years, but used relatively little in those schools. It's one of those blanket policies that covers the entire district but isn't really necessary for all schools. At-risk kids can show up any time throughout the year, so the seats are reserved at each school, though they usually go unfilled at JKLM schools. Probably a different story on the Hill where income disparity is block by block and many more kids are in distress, but you can see how more privileged parents are handling their close proximity to poverty in dozens of DCUM threads. It's not pretty. It's fucking ugly and loathsome. I wish there were a word in the English language for amused disgust or disgusted amusement, because it's what I feel every time I read someone claiming concern for the poor in their quest to rid schools of anyone who can't afford to live in the boundary of their neighborhood school. You are full. of. shit.[/quote] Are you the same long-winded PP who stated erroneously upthread that the feeder rights have been discontinued? The fact that those rights ARE continuing was, like, the most hotly debated and most high profile issue last summer, other than the ill-fated proposal for citywide lottery for HS. You enjoy sanctimonious criticism of other parents on the internet but you clearly have no idea of what you are talking about. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics