Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Why Muslims Don't Believe in Concept of Trinity"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Read again. I did not say you called Islam Barbaric in this thread. However, you or your posse did indeed paint Islam as entirely barbaric and at least one person did use precisely that word, even if it was in a different thread. If nobody buys anything I am saying you would not deem it necessary to continually respond to me. You respond to my posts because you are concerned that somebody out there might believe my posts, or they may at least start investigating. Quite honestly the only rebuttals I recall are - yes there may have been old manuscripts but they were from Ebionites But the Ebionites seem to have been practicing monotheism which is closer to original manuscript -theres no proof those manuscripts were in fact the oldest in the world Thats what the dating experts say -older doesn't mean accurate Well thats what the experts in Christianity say, who has refuted that these are the originals? -islam changed their holy book too The standardized Quran was created from the original. No add ons. No edits. So unless someone has something else to offer, what hasn't been answered?? [/quote] Sweetie, when you declare something, the burden is on you to prove it. The burden is not on us. It doesn't help that you respond with unclear references to "original sources," which, I hope you know, is a HUGE area of scholarly inquiry all on its own. . Just because one document might or might not be the oldest document that anybody has found, that in no way means the particular sect associated with that document "wins" the contest for "truthiness." It simply means that document was preserved and other documents were lost from the hundreds of other religious groups that were running around during the period. When will we find the next Dead Sea Scrolls? Nor does having an early date speak to the question of whether the authors were divinely inspired or merely inventive. I'm sure, however, you will post at midnight that you've won every argument here![/quote] There were two resources provided: Dr. Dirks and the Auburn research article. If you now insist on seeing the manuscripts, call Dr. Dirks at the divinity school. I think he would be happy to show you. Its merely a phone call.[/quote] The oldest known manuscripts say trinity and divinity of Jesus did not exist. There is much research to show why trinity and divinity was added later. Read the auburn research article. Its there if you want to know. You just may not be ready to know the truth.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics