Reply to Proposal is up!

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Proposal is up!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Isn't it interesting that the Committee charged with examining boundaries passed on the opportunity to address systemic overcrowding issues at Ward 3 elementaries even though those same schools are now expected to enroll the equivalent of 10 percent of their seats for OOB/at risk students.  Why doesn't this seem to add up?[/quote]

They got crucified for the tiny W3 changed they suggested...why would they go down that route again?[/quote]

Look at the Washington Post map. They did it again![/quote]

I don't know the blocks by heart, but posters upthread suggested that they had greatly reduced the Murch/Hearst swap.[/quote]

They pushed some Murch families to Lafayette, which makes a lot more sense geographically than the original Murch-to-Hearst proposal did.[/quote]

That is correct that they reduced the Murch-Hearst swap, though they added a Hearst to Murch swap, which is crazy.  How can you look anyone at Murch in the eye and say you have to go, but someone else gets to come in.  And if no one lives in the Hearst to Murch swap, why do it?

The Murch to Lafayette swap doesn't make all that much sense geographically, but is easier for the Murch parents to swallow because of their irrational fear of Hearst.[/quote]

Well, that's one way to look at it. But if you look at the map, you'll have trouble justifying it. Families who live two blocks from Murch get to stay rather than going to school a mile away. Families who already lived relatively far from Murch move to a school that is essentially equidistant. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics