Reply to Wife and I don't see eye-to-eye on money

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Wife and I don't see eye-to-eye on money"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Their issue is that it's a blended family (wanna guess why his first marriage fell apart?). He feels overburdened by all the kiddos, and possibly some spousal support, and married her only under the condition she wouldn't cost him more money. That's my guess, anyway.

My second guess is that once her children are old enough, she'll be out of there.[/quote]

I earn $250k+.  The burden is no issue.  There is no spousal support.  And there were no conditions about extra costs.

She and I are very happy, have a warm and honest relationship with lots of hot sex.

I dont know why I expected anything else from this discussion though, ad hominem is the only route people take here [b]rather than actually considering the question. [/b] I know the question hits home, obviously.  Not a single person has put forth a rational argument as to why a wife shouldn't contribute 50/50 or why she would literally be entitled to a subsidy.  Name calling emotional responses, mentions of the 'way it should be' etc - but no real argument.

The only one that actually made any sense had to do with child bearing but I hardly doubt that most woman want to reduce their relationships with their husbands to an exchange like that - i.e. wife gets additional income in exchange for child rearing.

[/quote]

because your "question" is beside the point. normal people do not pose or think about such questions. it never occured to me (or my husband) to demand any kind of split - we simply married because we liked spending time together. the rest of the things (money, childcare, house chores etc) have just worked themselves out (for almost 20 years).

on the other hand, you are obviously very invested into it, both in the real life and here, and one has to wonder why.[/quote]

no you never considered it, likely because you just assumed that you were entitled to all his earnings without any question, right?

[/quote]

This is where you keep losing people PP. No one is posting about feeling "entitled." These are massive assumptions you're making about people who don't follow the same game plan you and your wife are following. This is why you are turning people off. People are more than capable of having rational discussions with their spouses - their family - and come to different conclusions about what works best for their families without it being a sense of entitlement by one spouse or someone being subsidized by another.

I really wonder what your sense of family is. Because for you, it's a zero sum game, all based on money.[/quote]

no one said specifically that they were entitled, but when people just start out with ad hominem with no discussion it creates that.  the system for how many years has been men provide.  its the status quo, or was.  the entitlement comes based in the presumptions that are created over time and history in our culture.

i am happy to hear honest discussions and thought processes.

it just seems all to likely that the woman just 'kinda assumed' that husband's higher salary would accrue in portion or in total to her benefit.

and frankly, you have no idea about family life, certainly not enough to say it is "all based on money"

this is a thread about husband and wife and money.

if this was a thread about coaching teams or playing duets on the piano with my son or doing science experiments together or rubbing my wife's feet or making love or spending holidays with our families - i'd have plenty to talk about there too.

[/quote]

It is getting less and less clear what you mean by "entitlement". Yes, for a long time men were providers, but it was hardly the case that women were therefore entitled to their earnings. They were quite vulnerable, divorce was often illegal and there was no child or spousal support. I doubt may women would like to go back to those times of "entitlement".

Some people (men and women) today consider whatever either party makes to belong to the family, not individuals. Would you consider that entitlement? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics