Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "If you were in charge of FCPS, what budget cuts would you make?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Why on earth are there so many SPED kids now? [/quote] It was a blip. The grades before and after had enough for one aide and one special ed teacher and they had more kids. We were trying to figure out why our kids had such a high prevalence, but in the end it seems to be a statisical blip/cluster that happens every so often. When they got the MS, their grade (combined with the other 5 or so schools) was not so "out there". As I said, [b]It was a very unusual co-hort.[/b] [/quote] No, why are there so many SPED kids now in general? Whether it's "attention problems," autism, "spectrum issues," and so forth. We did not have this when we were growing up. And don't say "It just wasn't diagnosed." There were so many kids functionally normally at that time, the SPED kids truly were "special," as in there weren't so many of them. What is happening? Food additives? Environmental issues? Maternal nutrition? What is it?[/quote] [b]I don't know what to say if you will not accept the answer. My son has dyslexia and dysgraphia, in the past he would have been tracked on the tech route for electricians and mechanics. Now, they know how to remedy and accomodate the issues and he can access the highest level curriculum that his intelligence allows.[/b] [/quote] You are actually talking to a couple of different posters. I am not the person you just responded to, but I have posted a couple of times. Whether the increased aides to support inclusion is a good thing for individual students, you cannot deny that it is a budget buster for the school districts. My kid's class had a student with a one/one aid support. The aide went with the student from class to class, sat with only that student, and worked with only that student. I saw this kid in several non-school activities, and he was able to function quite well without one/one support with just a little extra guidance, but he needed--for reasons that are none of my business---one/one support at school. Lets say his aide fell into the middle of the pay grade for fcps aides. That means the district was paying around $30K, plus benefits, plus payroll taxes for just one student. There is also the normal cost/student that the district puts out for all the students. Is the district paying $40K to educate that one student? $50K? Multiply that aide's cost with all the other aides who are not there for the severely disabled students, and the cost is astronomical. There has to be a better way to provide a least restrictive environment without raising costs to $40-50K per special ed (aide required) student per year. I am sorry, but the cost is too high.[/quote] It sounds like the child in your example would have to have a one on one aide no matter where they were in school or that they would have to be in the different school. I don't see how that would reduce the budget. What is your solution for the education of such students? Yes, children with special needs cost more. Perhaps you think that is unfair. Try being in the shoes of the parents of that child and see if you think that is still unfair that more public money is spent on their child. I can assure that they are also coping with additional private costs that you do not have. Are you willing to help out with those? You know, to be fair, since your child costs you less. For some, the additional cost means that they will be trained/educated to become responsible contributing members of society. Much cheaper for society, in the long run, than not training/educating them and having them be supported by society fort he entirely of their lives. For the ones who cannot become independent ever, education can get them closer and require fewer services. For those for whom even that isn't possible, it will cost society for their entire lives. Unless, you are suggesting someone requiring that they not be born in the first place, I don't see how you can avoid the additional costs. To sum up, the children need teachers/aides no matter where they sit- in a classroom with GE or in a separate Special Ed classroom. I don't see how least restrictive environment adds costs. [/quote] I think you are over reacting. I never said it was a bad idea to go for the least restrictive environment for students. I actually think it is a good idea, and a benefit for society. However, just because the intention of the idea is a positive, it does not mean the implementation is a good thing. The only thing that is unfair is to say that a program which drains so much in financial resources, 5-10 x more money than it costs to educate any given student, from a district that is strapped for cash cannot even be looked at to see if there is a better, more cost effective way of doing things. There has to be a better way. In the case I mentioned above, what people see is a kid who functions well without one on one supervision at parties, at sports, at activities, who also behaves very well in class, interacts "normally" with classmates and who does not have any visible disabilities (downs syndrome, tics, hearing/vision loss, etc) is receiving one/one aid support. Anyone who is not emotionally vested in that child will look objectively and think, is there a better way the district can service this child? It also makes one wonder if that child gets one/one support, how many others are getting it as well, who might actually do okay with an aide who works with several children. To say that the aide program at fcps cannot even be looked at, evaluated, and restructured because "it's not fair that my child is not typical" is unrealistic and dare I say a bit selfish. It is a very expensive program benefiting a limited number of students. What is wrong with asking if it can be done better, more effectively and less expensively?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics