Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "What exactly is Chechyna'a beef with the USA? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's obvious that you feel personally threatened by what I have shared, though I gave no personal details whatsoever. I am merely stating what I have personally experienced as fact. All men of all religions violate the laws of their religions and they do it all the time. Yes, my experience includes Saudi men . They are no different. They are all men, period. The point is there is no such thing as a lock solid religious action. It is human beings after all who invented religion, and when it suits them , so called devout or not, they set aside. Men are imperfect and any religious following made up of men will be imperfect and fail to meet its ideal, not just rarely, but most of the time.[/quote] I got no idea why you feel I'd be threatened by what you shared. What do I care? The world is full of Arabs, do as many as you like. My husband have cousins here. They enjoy the [b]local talent[/b] with abandon. They aren't devout. In fact, what you say and what I say is in no way in contradiction, and I don't know why you keep picking at it. Again: devout Muslims do not have girlfriends. If they do, they aren't devout. I don't question that men you slept with put their religion aside to have a piece. All I am saying is that it makes them not devout. [/quote] Yes, clearly you resent and are threatened by my point: that no man is[i] always devout [/i] when religion stands in the way of their more base motivations , but rather than debate that point you : Suggest that I am "the local talent" in other words[i] a prostitute[/i] for the simple fact that I pointed out that plenty of muslims who pray five times a day, who fast, who go to mecca, who give zikat, will also have sex outside of marriage and , given a choice between no sex , and doing something against their religious teachings, will choose to make an exception for themselves. Not once, not twice, but again and again and again, NOT BECAUSE said woman is " the local talent" , but because, well, they are men and they really , really , really would like to have sex now, please. No religion can take that out of them, because all religion is, is an aspiration of an ideal. No religion has a premium on morality, and your suggestion that somehow, while thsoe Shia may make things oh so convenient and easy for themselves, the Sunni belief is "pure" and that there is somewhere a religion for the "pure and devout" is indicative of intolerance, and kinda sickening. That's the kind of talk that really turns off Americans. Like President Obama says, "its not a competition". In America its considered offensive to say that one religion is "more devout" than another. Its rude. It offends. It should. Men are just men, and if they set whatever religious beliefs they have aside either to beg a woman to have sex with them, or to plant bombs that kill 8 year old children, its not because they belong to a "less devout faith" , but because in the case of killing, they have a lot of hate and rage inside of them, and they gave into it, because they are human, and sometimes that is pretty ugly. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics