Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Arlington U11/U12 pre-academy "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I don't know why they didn't bring down PA1 players, but most of the PA2 players they brought down were not kids who were even eligible to repeat U11 [quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That’s what many thought too until offers went out and it was evident that the guests were simply brought in from 2015 age group to win. One or two trapped players who ultimately got offers were brought in a few times, but more often than not were guest players who were staying in the 2015 age group. If development is the goal, why not play rostered 2016s and allow 2016 PA2s to guest? [quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't understand bringing guest players to every game and playing them over kids on your own roster. And those parents whose kids are sitting out are returning next year for more of the same? What team are the guests coming from if this is the top team in the age group?[/quote] I heard other parents say the top PA2/PA1 teams from 2015. Somehow they know who all the players are while I am still learning their kids names 😅[/quote] Sounds like the club brought trapped 2015 players to games to get a good look for next year. Some of the parents of those players decided to stay at 2015 for next year. This definitely is not an individual coach’s decision and it is not a normal guesting situation. Either way, just have your daughter put in work and quit whining on here. You’re not going to complain your way to the top. [/quote][/quote] If it was about winning, wouldn’t they have brought in P1 players? They were looking to bring down players from 2015 but ultimately chose against it. They were also sending a message to the kids towards the end of the 2016 roster that there was a possibility they could get cut with the age change. I think this is mostly parents looking for reasons to complain. Even 13 players on a 9v9 is fine. [/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics