Reply to Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Guess the resentful Woottonites should have taken out extra loans to purchase houses in the Churchill district instead of Wootton. Sucks to be reminded that being Upper Middle Class means you share some structural conditions with the Middle Class and not the 1%ers of McMansion Potomac. A tragedy. [/quote]

You sound really silly. Wootton is mostly middle class - upper middle class and we know it. We aren’t confused about our status. People like us sacrifice and live in small dated houses to get into the district rather than spending the same dollars to live in a nicer home zoned to QO or RM. I and many other parents sacrifice cars and vacations. Yes there is some expensive housing but that’s not the majority by any means. [/quote]

You’re stilled zoned into Wootton even with the relocation, so what’s the problem? Wootton has been clamoring for a new building forever at board meetings when other schools with less advocacy have it worse, and they now get it. Now if having some lower income students make up more of the student population is the issue, why should the rest of the county subsidize Wootton’s “closed borders.”[/quote]

DP. Why are you against holding MCPS compliant with the law on school closure?  You might have a point if Crown had been built AFTER a Wootton boundary change to include kids from other high schools. That would have been transparent.

But it wasn’t.

MCPS had to change the Wootton boundary in order to fill Crown after it appears that it may have knowingly used outdated (pre-COVID) enrollment projections to break ground on gifted valuable land in the heart of densely populated Crown that it was going to lose if it didn’t.  [b]MCPS couldn’t move the Wootton boundaries in time to break ground (it tried previously and failed)[/b], so it’s doing so retroactively to cover what it appears had been its plan all along.

MCPS had publicly claimed that Crown was built for the very kids you are championing, but it’s [b]now taking it away from them[/b].  Don’t you think a state of the art, [b]under enrolled Crown with smaller class sizes [/b]would benefit those kids more, while allowing for the future growth of Crown that we know is coming in the next 5-10 years?  Under Taylor’s recommendation, WJ will be significantly under enrolled with low FARMS, so I guess WJ families get a benefit's the Crown kids are being denied. [/quote]

DP. MCPS has not "tried and failed" to change the Wootton boundaries. There hasn't even been a HS boundary study in the area for decades.

Crown kids will now be going to school in Crown, so it isn't taking it away from them. And class sizes are the same regardless of a school's enrollment. The more students enrolled, the more teachers allocated.[/quote]

1. [b]There were boundary studies and significant pushback [/b]

2. Teachers are assigned based on class size range. 3-5 fewer kids in a class makes a difference. Also, the facility is less crowded overall.

3. Less Gaithersburg kids get to go to Crown because Wootton is taking 1700 spots. [/quote]

When? For which schools? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics