Reply to Taylor's Feb. Rec for Woodward Boundary Study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Taylor's Feb. Rec for Woodward Boundary Study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In a class of 30 students, it is going from 25 non-FARM students to 20 non-FARM students. Not an earth shattering change. No need for hyperbole.[/quote]

And remember most FARMS students just like the non FARMS students are good kids whose parents care about their education.[/quote]

This arguments shouldn't be used to concentrate poverty in one school when alternative is available without extra travel.[/quote]

Is still below avg poverty compared to county. And JFK and Wheaton in region.  This won’t resonate. I’m a farmland family. It is what is is. Who cares[/quote]

County average is meanigless.

There are some areas where we can distribute and some areas where we can't distribute without creating hardship. If we can create many HS around 20% FARMS then we should do it rather than creating Whitman 2.0 and Woodward with 35% FARMS when they are next to each other.

Here, there is a perfect chance to add one high FARMS ES in Woodward and WJ each instead of adding both in Woodward. It will benefit all students. It's a brainded decision. I am not even from WJ/Woodward zoned.[/quote]

You’re not from WJ/Woodward? If true, you need to get a better hobby.

But my guess is you’re farmland and against Wheaton Woods coming to your precious new construction high school[/quote]

Do you realize that many pepple are commenting here :)

PP actually makes a lot of sense. One ES can be added to WJ and one in Woodward. There is no downside.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics