Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "wow- Lance Armstrong is a sociopath"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You're right, 11:06, sports are not very important in the scheme of things but I do consider it important not to attack and try to ruin innocent people like Betsy Andreu, Mike Anderson, and Emma O'Reilly who are only telling the truth. I don't think doping is good for cycling but, as a former admirer of Lance, what upsets me is his unethical behavior towards other people. Do you really think that it is unimportant that Emma O'Reilly feared that his lawsuit against her would bankrupt her? [/quote] How exactly did Lance ruin these people? Are they now homeless bums in the streets of America? [/quote] you are really dumb. having a team (literally, a large team) of attorneys bombard you with litigation that you cannot afford to defend, all the while Lance is blackballing you in your chosen profession, can ruin someone. [/quote] No, it couldn't. It could embarrass/frustrate/scare/anger/etc you, but it can't "ruin" you. Stop being so damn dramatic. [/quote] I'm guessing you've never been sued. It absolutely ruins people's lives. It has caused suicide in several cases especially when the government is doing the suing or a deep pocket plaintiff like Armstrong.[/quote] It only ruins your life if it bankrupts you and leaves you penniless. Otherwise, it is just a terrible experience you'd never want to repeat. This is not ruination. You Lance haters are a bit scary with your over-inflated outrage. [/quote]Actually I wrote the original post above and want to remind you that I accused him of unethical behavior towards innocent people and that Emma O'Reilly feared that he would bankrupt her. I didn't say that he ruined her, just that he tried to do it. (BTW she is not co-author of Walsh's book). So are you saying that that is okay as long as none of those people ended up homeless? So is it okay if I steal from a family member or burglarize someone's house as long as they don't end up homeless? You have a very distorted view of what acceptable behavior is. In fact, you're acting a bit like Lance with your dictionary out. For him it was a quibble over the definition of cheating which he argued didn't fit him. For you, it's the word "ruin." As long as no one was completely destroyed per your definition then it must not have been so bad. Bizarre. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics