Reply to Pope Leo XIV says 'inhuman treatment of immigrants' in the U.S. isn't 'pro-life'

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Pope Leo XIV says 'inhuman treatment of immigrants' in the U.S. isn't 'pro-life'"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You are comparing the privilege of being president of the United States to basic human rights (we used to think everyone deserved) or the right of an international college grad to get a green card (professed by JD Vance a year ago) or the right of tourists to express themselves and not to have their privacy violated (protected in our Consitution)?[/quote]

The point being that long before fascism was a thing, America knew that people born somewhere else will always have a loyalty to that country and its people. Your tourists for example seem to be very concerned about events on the other side of the world where they come from, and our international grads have been an express lane for IP theft and wage erosion.

None of these things are good for America, and its time to get back to our roots and stop being suckers for every international grievance group.

[/quote]

[b]You sound like someone who does not believe in the Constitution. I do. [/b]

I also know that tourism brings in over 2 trillion dollars per year and that it is plain stupid to violate people's rights and hurt us in one fell swoop. Threatening to monitor people's social media is going to stop exactly ZERO bad actors but will keep millions of dollars out of our economy.

But you Trumpers never cared about the American people, only about the billionaire tax breaks. [/quote]

Maybe you do today, on this issue, but as soon as you get what you want, its going to be right back to: [url]https://www.amazon.com/Active-Liberty-Interpreting-Democratic-Constitution/dp/0307274942[/url]

"Indeed, the Constitution’s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a [b]world that is dead and gone[/b]."

Your kind already showed their hand, and we're not particularly hamstringing ourselves for an inconstant "partner."

Your kind loved to say "Freedom of Speech is not freedom from consequences" when it suited you. And so here we are. Now its just being used against your pets instead of Americans.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics