Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Tulane bans HS from ED for 1 year after student backs out"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can hold two thoughts in my head at once. I can recognize that people should honor their ED commitments, and I can recognize that colleges are the ones who gain the most by filling a significant % of the class through ED. [b]The vast majority of students do not benefit from this system.[/b] [/quote] Majority of students also don't benefit from financial aid and don't benefit from having hooks. Should schools eliminate all these? ED is fine, just like giving needy families financial aid is fine. No system is fair to everyone. I cannot afford a Maserati or Porsche and am totally at peace with my inability.[/quote] +1. DD used her ED at a public flagship because won’t get any need based aid. I am 100% ok with that. Stop the whining. Your rich snowflake will be ok.[/quote] Lots of people don’t have state flagships at the level of UVA, Michigan, Berkeley, UNC, etc. I think most people are savvy and knowledgeable enough to know that merit aid is rare in the T-20 range. They want to be able to shop around in the tier below [/quote] Well by definition, if you want to "shop around in the tier below" you cannot do ED. It is a choice, you get to choose, but you don't get to ED and "shop around". That's what RD/EA are for. SO you get to use that choice [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics