Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Potential 100 million jobs will be lost to AI according to senate report"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You know who isn’t worried? Plumbers Electricians Carpenters Nurses Doctors Dentists Police officers Landscapers Construction workers Teachers Physical therapists EMTs Surgeons [/quote] Says who? All the doctors in my family, most of whom are surgeons, are very concerned about the rise in AI being used to diagnose patients, for instance. Entire teams of specialists can be rendered redundant as AI gets better at analyzing disparate symptoms to identify the body systems affected and likely underlying causes that can take human doctors years to diagnose. [b]The encroachment on the medical field is already significant.[/b] [/quote] No. I appreciate you have family members who are doctors, but I am a doctor. [b]AI isn't encroaching significantly onto healthcare.[/b] Sorry. Cite it, if you think you have other reasons besides anecdote. OpenEvidence is helpful. There are places in radiology and pathology reporting where a first pass with AI is sometimes helpful. Where else? That being said, I'm a [i]doctor[/i]. Of course, if there is a better way to provide health care to people, I'm all for it. I'm sure we will get there eventually. Heck, if there were no illnesses, accidents, or aging, I'd be out of a job -- and that would be [i]great[/i]. Putting me out of work would be a fantastic endgame. Until then, I'm not going to lose my mind, soil myself, or whatever it is you think I should be doing at the prospect. Not going to change the outcome anyway. [/quote] I keep advocating for the AMA and state licensing authorities to make continuing medical education requirements at least as rigorous as continuing legal education requirements. The way doctors who aren't in hospital and research settings quickly lose track of new drugs, interventions, and advances is disturbing. Anyway, let me catch you up: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/health/chatgpt-ai-doctors-diagnosis.html https://www.wired.com/story/microsoft-medical-superintelligence-diagnosis/ https://time.com/7299314/microsoft-ai-better-than-doctors-diagnosis/ https://hms.harvard.edu/news/ai-system-detailed-diagnostic-reasoning-makes-its-case https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025/09/29/if-ai-can-diagnose-patients-what-are-doctors-for https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/mayo-clinics-ai-tool-identifies-9-dementia-types-including-alzheimers-with-one-scan/ [/quote] The astonishing part here is you believe click bait. Also, legal CLE is a joke and useless. Anybody that has to deal with that BS every couple of years will tell you that. Last I checked, it’s still not ethical to steal shit from clients and lie. Otherwise, the rest of it is noise and a way for people to try to credential themselves by lecturing. So dumb [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics