Reply to When is the standardized craze gonna hit the LACs?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "When is the standardized craze gonna hit the LACs? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Use of standardized tests is not a "craze". Most LACs were test required pre-covid.

Now that tests are shorter, digital and more easily accessible, I think the ones that were test required before covid will go back to that.

As others have noted, CMC already announced it will go back to test required next year. And even though they are currently TO, they do require test results from all admitted students so they can take note of what it was, even if it was not part of the admission decision this year.

I expect Pomona, Swarthmore, Wellesley and Williams to go back to test required in the coming years, like they were before.

I do expect Bowdoin, Wesleyan and Carleton will stay test optional for the long-term.
[/quote]
To what benefit? These schools are receiving more fellowship winners and grad school acceptances than ever. What’s the point of changing demographics cause Harvard needs to?[/quote]

???  Most of the most well-regarded LACs (Williams, Amherst, Swat, Pomona, Wellesley, Carleton, Claremont, etc.) mandated tests back pre-covid only 5 years ago. Why would they not go back given it helped them choose great classes before? Only Wesleyan and Bowdoin (I believe) were test optional then. Standardized tests are a simple and low-effort way schools can put a check on grade inflation that's more objective than GPA. [b]And don't suggest AP scores, those are only relevant for schools that offer APs. Many public and private schools don't teach AP curriculum so it's only a useful gauge if all schools offered the same amount of subjects with the same curriculum[/b] in the same way.[/quote]
Seems like the wisest thing for schools to begin demanding. For decades, students at privates have taken AP tests without taking AP courses- it isn’t needed. If you actually want to see how a student performs long term in a core curriculum, this makes much more sense than the SAT.

Anyway, [b]these schools have little reason to go back to TO[/b]. Their apps are up, their yields are improving, and their students are doing fine. I don’t know why people are so obsessed with test scores.[/quote]

Just wait until they announce it one by one in the next two years.  [b]These are private colleges, they can set whatever admission policies they want.  [/b]Mark this page and be back in two years to see how wrong you were.  [/quote]
I wholeheartedly agree that they’re allowed to set whatever test optional policy they want. Glad we could agree.[/quote]

I actually do agree.  Before the Affirmative Action case, I said so.  I still say so after the Affirmative Action case.  If they receive federal funding the policy has to be constitutional.  They may keep legacy, athletes, and donor preference until one day SCOTUS rules it unconstitutional.  SLAC can even get rid of the very small amount of federal funding they received or cut any other ties with the fed, and set any admission policy they want, including race-based preference.

But they are going back to test required.  [/quote]
Can you stop rambling? Colleges can and will stay test optional if they wish. Bowdoin has since the 60s. There is nothing unconstitutional about being neutral about the utility of a private company's exam.[/quote]

[b]Your reading comprehension is really poor, did I say test optional unconstitutional?  [/b]

Colleges can stay test optional if they wish.  But they are reinstating test required one by one.  Wait a year or two.  Come back to this thread.  [/quote]
[b]Then why bring up constitutionality?
[/b][quote] But they are reinstating test required one by one.  Wait a year or two.  Come back to this thread.[/quote]
Just cause you repeat something, doesn't actually make it a valid or educated point. It's clear you are here to waste my time. Come back to this thread in a year or two.[/quote]

Relevant in that SLACs could adopt racial preference admission if they give up fed funding (small amount, easily given up).  But they chose not to.  [/quote]

The point is that these private colleges can do what they wish.  SLACs can reinstate race-based admission policy by simply giving up a small amount of fed funding, yet they chose not to.
They don't really care about diversity, holistic review is [b]all about maintain their privileged class kids[/b], in the name of DEI.  [/quote]

I agree that this is true. But you said it yourself, “a small amount of federal funding.” Who do you think is going to keep these colleges running? Please join the real world, it is that class that pays the bills. The middle class can no longer afford to spend $500,000 or more to send their 2 kids to college. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics