Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Benefits of taking Algebra 1 in 6th grade"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Great! People who don't want math acceleration can opt out, and those who want it can have it available. Everyone should choose what they think works best for their child. Anyone who truly believes that math acceleration confers no benefit shouldn't be bothered by other kids who do accelerate. [/quote] Sounds about right. But if you go on a public forum claiming it’s beneficial for admissions at top colleges, don’t be surprised if you get some pushback.[/quote] Where would the advanced students go if not to top colleges? Of course not all, but a good number get offers from best colleges. [/quote] If 700 kids take Algebra in 6 in one district alone, it’s not possible that half of it will make it to top colleges. Probably not even 10%. Colleges want to see a rigorous coursework and evidence the student can handle the classes for intended major. A kid entering high school at geometry, getting A, and [b]completing AP calculus BC with 5, [/b]will check the most rigorous mark, and there’s no reason to believe they can’t handle more advanced college classes. Taking more math classes won’t change that, it just means the kid was [b]set on that path from elementary school because the parents put in the effort[/b]. Look up details in Harvard vs. Fair Admissions, at no point the DE math came out as a factor. It’s going to be down to other things first and DE math has a negligible impact.[/quote] Colleges won't know that when they need to admit. They'll at most see the grades for the first quarter of Calc BC, and they won't have an AP score in the application packet for a kid taking BC in 12th. Kids who take BC in 11th will have both a full course grade and the AP score available in their application packet. For the second bolded point, that depends entirely on the school district. In FCPS and LCPS, 7th grade Algebra has very little to do with parental effort and a lot more to do with natural math aptitude. The bar is not high, and many kids clear the bar with nothing more than the math taught in their schools. [/quote] If a student enters high school at precalculus, it is expected they’ll keep taking math over the years, and that implies math offered at high school or outside, and will include Calculus, Statistics, and others like Multivariable. If a student enters high school at geometry, taking a regular progression of one math class per year they’ll end up at Calculus in senior year. While AP exam is not available, grades in first semester are. Both are taking full advantage of what’s [b]available to them in high school[/b], colleges won’t be looking at what was done in middle school. It’s not expected students use their summers to advance in math. One caveat is that students advanced in math often do other activities that make them better applicants, but that a classic example of correlation without causation. People are so invested in believing their kid has a leg up, there’s nothing to convince them otherwise. [/quote] If your high school offers through multivariable calculus and your student enters high school in geometry and takes up through calc AB…no, they aren’t taking advantage of what is available to them. They are taking what’s appropriate for them, but that’s different from what’s available [/quote] Ok, somehow you know better than colleges themselves, but haven’t provided anything to substantiate your deeply held belief: Here is what MIT says about the coursework in high school: “To be clear, [b]we do not expect students do anything above and beyond what is required to demonstrate their readiness for the MIT education.[/b] However, we also know that many of our applicants have interests, aptitudes, and curiosities that may carry themselves beyond what is offered at their local high school, and the resources here may help you explore those further if you wish.” Readiness is detailed in this link, Calculus being highest level of math that’s expected: https://mitadmissions.org/apply/prepare/foundations/ You’re so enamored of the idea that your kid has a leg up from taking algebra in 6th grade that there’s nothing that could change your mind about it. If your interest in math is leading to taking dual enrollment classes, that’s great. If your thing is being part of math club and tutor other students, doing research, or whatever floats your boat, that’s equally good. You won’t be dinged because you “only” took Calculus. [/quote] Please realize “readiness” for applicants is the minimum to apply. If you like at who is actually admitted and attends, the vast majority have had math beyond calc BC[/quote] [b]If they took Statistics they'd understand the difference between correlation and causation. [/b] MIT smirks at the "rigor" of a high school / dual Enrollment Multivariable Calc / Linear Algebra class. That's not what impresses them. [/quote] +1[/quote] What are you talking about? It isn’t what impresses them per se, but the majority of applicants getting accepted are going to have post BC calc math (among other impressive things). [/quote] That’s likely true for math majors, not sure you can generalize to all admits. If you read what MIT says about post BC Calculus it’s clear those classes don’t carry as much weight as APs in Physics and Chemistry. The rigor in DE varies widely, just from my kid taking Multivariable at the local community college, it’s easy to get an A without mastery and they don’t even cover the entire material. Colleges know this very well, yes, it adds something, but it won’t be the determining factor. And it’s not required, someone getting a 5 in Calculus BC would have absolutely no problem acing the community college Multivariable, so it’s not really a significant differentiator. Since the acceleration occurs mostly in middle school, it says very little about talent and ability and more about socioeconomic status, it’s mostly parents buying enrichment and pushing for higher math placement. Again colleges know this, it’s not a secret to anyone, and it’s not the back door to top colleges as some claim.[/quote] The colleges know your socioeconomic status. Obviously, they’ll treat FGLI kids differently from UMC ones. If you’re a UMC kid, and most of the top kids from your school are in multivariable, you’ll look like a kid who is less motivated or less intelligent than your peer group. [/quote] You won’t look less motivated and less intelligent because your parents weren’t pushy enough to place you in Algebra in 6th grade. So much cope and wishful thinking from tiger parents. You can still do Algebra in 7th and have no dual enrollment math if the school enforces Calculus AB then BC sequence or the student chooses to take AP Statistics in senior year. It’s not going to be looked down at. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics