Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Was there this much split articulation in the first set of options? So many elementary schools getting split up under all 4 scenarios.[/quote] My sneaking suspicion is that this will leave them optionality on adjusting clusters at a later date based on how demographics shift over time. [/quote] What do you mean?[/quote] They will have more flexibility regarding adjusting the boundaries of these clusters in the future as they see how enrollment changes. Once they’ve gone to split articulation, do you really think they won’t consider moving one group to the alternate school in the future? It seems perfectly set up for this in places where there is a large group of split articulated schools. [/quote] They said something in the presentation about ES splits possibly being addressed in future boundary studies.[/quote] You mean elementary school boundary studies? [/quote] Yes, I think that's what they meant. (Though no elementary school boundary studies are currently proposed.)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics