Reply to Hating donut hole life: athletic recruiting version

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Hating donut hole life: athletic recruiting version"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Really hard to feel sorry for people when the athletic hook doesn’t work for them. [/quote]

It’s not hard if you’re not an ahole because you know how much work the kid put into it.[/quote]

Our kids who study hard, act in plays, win speech & debate competitions, tutor peers, and write for the paper also are kids who put a lot a lot of work in. they just don't feel as entitled to gain admission with lower academic standards!

why should students whose EC is sports gain admission with lower academic standards to play sports that don't bring any benefit to the school's other students? who watches cross-country, volleyball, squash, etc.?

at least diversity helps everyone by not having people in bubbles.[/quote]

As a parent of a D1 athlete and another who was heavily involved in school ECs, there’s no comparison. The D1 athlete’s commitment was exponentially higher, and the non-athlete child would agree.  The pressure she was under to perform at her sport and to peak at exactly the right time in state and national level competition was nothing like writing for the school paper.

I’m extremely proud of both of them, but the fact that the athlete’s grades lagged in comparison to the EC kid is completely justified considering the level of commitment. And it made sense to me that the athlete ended up at an Ivy with slightly lower grades and considerably lower test scores, whereas the other student with the 1500 SAT did not. [/quote]

That is so wrong. So wrong. It's sad that you, a reasonably intelligent adult, would think like this.

[/quote]

Being one of the best athletes in your sport ever in your 100 year old HS, and one of the top 75 athletes in your sport in the country (among thousands of participants) in your graduation year AND finishing in the top 5 percent of your class at the same time is more impressive than finishing in the top 2 percent and writing for the school paper.  I witnessed the determination that both took, and it just is.  No one could ever convince me otherwise.   
[/quote]

LOL you really think that being one of the "best athletes" at an old high school (who cares if it's 100 years old??) is better than being a more impressive student and journalist. Please. You have no idea what kind of determination, creativity, team play, empathy, intelligence and stamina you need to write for a school paper.[/quote]

Funny you say that. I do. I was the editor in chief of my college newspaper.  It came out weekly.  Every Friday morning and was like a full time job. You need the skills you mention sure, but it’s not the same as competing at the state and national level. You clearly don’t have any understanding or appreciation of what is required of an athlete and don’t have my perspective, so you’ll never get it.  It’s not worth my time trying to explain it to you, but see my post about about how my daughter actually experienced high school if you want to try.

[/quote]

As the editor in chief of a five day a week college daily I say hold my beer. It was a ton of work, stress, etc. Because there was a ton of management, leadership, etc. involved. I could do everything perfectly but if a reporter forgot to show up to cover an event or I took a day off and something really bad got published, it was on me. One day a week is a joke.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics