Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wallace’s response to the Motion To Compel with respect to him. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69510553/707/lively-v-wayfarer-studios-llc/ He attests to not having any Signal communications related to Lively.[/quote] Pretty sure we know he was included on some Signal communications, so that means he deleted everything.[/quote] Signal has a “disappear” function that causes messages to self delete (on all devices) after a certain amount of time. Do Blake’s attorneys not know how it works? They aren’t getting anything useful from discovery on Signal, if it ever existed. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
