Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wallace’s response to the Motion To Compel with respect to him. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69510553/707/lively-v-wayfarer-studios-llc/ He attests to not having any Signal communications related to Lively.[/quote] It's nice for Wallace that he both has a brain and good counsel, unlike the Wayfarer parties. Lively can argue til she's blue in the face that he maybe should have thought he might get sued, but he wisely used an app that auto deleted while there were no claims pending against him. If it's not there then it's not there. I am intrigued how he mentioned his "team" and used the plural form multiple times in reference to his experts but swears up and down he never hired or paid anyone. He's either telling the truth or very sure of his methods. I think Liman will rule against him again on the client list, which I disagree with.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
