Reply to NYT: "The Trouble with Men"

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "NYT: "The Trouble with Men""

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I know this forum is a bubble, but let's not pretend that SMBC is a viable option for the vast majority of women for logistical and financial reasons.  That doesn't mean you should settle for a loser, but for most people the choice is settle vs. no kids, not settle vs, SMBC.[/quote]

With all due respect, yes it is. IVF may be prohibitively expensive but that’s not the only route to SMBC. Most households with children are headed by women, so while how much of that is “choice” is anyone’s guess, there’s no overwhelming financial or logistical hurdle here. [/quote]

I mean, kids are expensive.  Most families need two incomes to make it work.  Or one income with the other parent home providing childcare.  How many women make enough money and/or have enough family support to afford it on their own?[/quote]

No they do not. A nurse with a ba helps degree can make 90K a year working 3 12 hour shifts. She can buy an apartment in a good district in Frederick and live comfortably  once they kid/kids are over 10, she can do 4 shifts and make over 100k. That is plenty of income.

And people who have friends and family with similar aged kids can take turns babysitting each other's kids while parents work or pick up shifts.
[/quote]

I was a single father in basically the same position, and not as fun or easy as you make it sound.[/quote]

I know women who are doing/ have done this, and they are happy with their choice. Men and women are different so this might not necessarily be as good an option for men as it is for women.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics