Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "NYT: "The Trouble with Men""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I know this forum is a bubble, but let's not pretend that SMBC is a viable option for the vast majority of women for logistical and financial reasons. That doesn't mean you should settle for a loser, but for most people the choice is settle vs. no kids, not settle vs, SMBC.[/quote] The problem is that people restrict themselves to just two models: parent with a romantic partner or parent alone. One of my straight female coworkers paired up platonically with another straight female teacher in our district so that they could have and raise children. Townhouse in Germantown initially, then a SFH in Frederick. Their kids are late ES age now and her parenting partner just started dating so they may part ways, but the hard part is already done. [/quote] +1. And many women " pair up" like this even if living in separate houses next to each other without any formal arrangements. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics