Reply to Why hasn't GMU surpassed UVA, W&M, VT?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Why hasn't GMU surpassed UVA, W&M, VT?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let’s see an admissions rate of almost 90%, no need to score well on standardized test or have a solid GPA.  [/quote]

Read the thread; GMUs historically adds more buildings and hires more Profs as the demand grows.  The goal is to let people in and not keep people out. Seeing a low acceptance rate for GMU is considered a failure in its mission for the community.

[/quote]

Glad you are proud of your school but many reasons why it hasn’t passed the schools in your title.  Get that you won’t be able to accept the facts.  [/quote]

I think you really missed the point: Great School - prestige = GMU. That's the recurring theme. The thread already went through GMU's merits that place it on the national stage. The Nobel Prizes brought it briefly to the international stage. These are the facts.

If you want the traditional schools with prestige then the schools listed in the title would be for you.

I'm not going to bash the other schools - each are great in their own right. I'm just saying if the only thing you are looking at is how exclusive something is? then you are missing out. 
 [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics