Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Feds Only Reasonable Accomodations"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m sure all the shop workers and waiters are rolling their eyes at your need for WFO. Most people have long commutes and make less. Also true for hospital workers, mechanics and receptionists. If they get sick or have kids and can’t make it work, they find a new job close to home, work PT or quit. America doesn’t make it easy since there’s almost no safety net.[/quote] I’m sure they are rolling their eyes, but who cares? Construction workers work outdoors without heat and AC. Should everyone else have to work without heat and AC in order to make it fair? Should everyone from grocery baggers to neurosurgeons be paid the same $20 per hour to make it fair? Shop workers and waiters don’t have to stay shop workers and waiters forever. 99% of people who WFH in the last several years have not done so since the beginning of their working lives. My first couple of jobs were working at a tree nursery, daycare, and a bakery. I had many different jobs. I worked my way up and up and now I am in a a high skill WFH job. That’s how it’s supposed to work, no? If WFH is truly less productive then why not cut those salaries to where they match the productivity and skill set instead of increasing costs by requiring RTO?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics