Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Pls don’t cancel your Kennedy center tickets "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What a bunch of worthless weirdos on this thread.[/quote] Curious what makes you say this? People voting with their feet or dollars is common. Is there a real reason or just bc you like DT?[/quote] I'm not a Trump fan, but I don't see any real evidence of any significant changes except for performers voluntarily cancelling their own shows. Its over reaction. [b]And previously, the KC was primarily run by those that supported Democrats[/b]. I'm guessing you were A OK with that?[/quote] You knew that was a lie when you typed it and hit submit. The KC has always been nonpartisan, appointed by both Democrats and Republicans alike. PP what is the point of posting lies on an anonymous board. The board is appointed to six-year-terms that overlap. It has been that way from 1971 until 2025. Even the Kennedy Center honorees have been bipartisan and crossed party lines. It will be interested to see who the honorees are the next four years. All Magats and billionaire donors, no doubt.[/quote] DP. The board is still bipartisan. Calm down. :roll: https://www.kennedy-center.org/about-us/leadership/trustees/[/quote] It is not. The First Ladies are honorary and still listed, but that’s just a ceremonial thing. You’re wrong. [/quote] Oh! So, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Sheldon Whitehouse, Mark Warner, Chris Van Hollen, Hakeem Jeffries, and many more are just "honorary"? No. You're wrong. Ex Officio members can still vote. :roll: [/quote] This says the ex officio members are non-voting. https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/kennedy-center-president-departs-after-trump-becomes-board-of-trustees-chair/3843347/?amp=1 [/quote] That is not what the article says. It says that *Bowser* is not a voting member. [b]Can ex-officio members vote, and are they counted in determining whether a quorum is present? [/b] “Ex officio” is a Latin term meaning “by virtue of office or position.” Ex-officio members of boards and committees, therefore, are persons who are members by virtue of some other office or position that they hold. For example, if the bylaws of an organization provide for a Committee on Finance consisting of the treasurer and three other members appointed by the president, the treasurer is said to be an ex-officio member of the finance committee, since he or she is automatically a member of that committee by virtue of the fact that he or she holds the office of treasurer. [b]Without exception, ex-officio members of boards and committees have exactly the same rights and privileges as do all other members, including, of course, the right to vote.[/b] https://robertsrules.com/frequently-asked-questions/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics