Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump wants Ann Selzer punished for her Iowa poll Predicition."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let's not forget that Selzer planned to look at the data when her fraud was first discovered. She retired rather than face scrutiny. That's something a guilty person would do. [/quote] It's not Fraud. Please. You people would stone your own mother if Trump told you to.[/quote] Listen, we live in a world where a person can be found guilty of falsifying business records because in Feb of 2017 he labeled reimbursement to his lawyer of a cash settlement for an NDA as a “legal expense”. He labeled it as such using a drop down menu in accounting software. The conviction required the jury to believe that the Feb 2017 act was done in furtherance of defrauding NY voters in the Nov 2016 election. So, don’t be mad that the convicted felon now has expansive views of the concept of “fraud” after his interactions with the legal system. [/quote] It wasn’t a drop down menu error. It was the CFO’s hand written note on Cohen’s bank statement for how they’d “gross up” the money being paid as a retainer to cover the taxes, when it was really reimbursement for an NDA. It was to hide it. If you’re going to try to post a gotcha, at least get your facts straight. [/quote] The “falsified” was the labeling of it as a “legal expense”. The bank note was evidence…. But you’re proving the point. You all were all too happy to stretch legal theories into novel areas. And all that really matters is if you can get 12 Americans to vote guilty (and it helps if you have a heavy handed judge and a state AG who has no shame). So, don’t worry about how ridiculous the theory against Selzer is. This will all play out in court. [/quote] Just like Durham, huh babe? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics