Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Why is there so much opposition to ending birthright citizenship?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]When virtually every other sane first world country doesn't have it? For starters, Spain, the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, France, Greece, Australia, Japan, Singapore, China, Colombia, nor the Czech Republic and any of the many other countries liberals say they're going to move to do not have birth right citizenship. What Trump is proposing isn't extreme at all, so why is there resistance to enacting common sense reform? It's also funny too, because as these elections showed, many coming over the border who eventually establish themselves aren't even Democratic voters either, so the Dems may actually seriously want to rethink they're immigration and citizenship policies before they blindly stand up for making it extremely easy for letting in millions of super catholic people who are now showing to be socially conservative and supporters of traditional family values. There was a time when the 14th amendment served a purpose, but it is the year 2024. Birthright citizenship is now much more of a security liability than anything. Why shouldn't we end it when most of the countries liberals espouse and hold up as role models don't even have it? [/quote] Because when it comes to immigration, Democrats have for the past 20 or so years—taken stances that are unpopular and lead to election losses. They love to shoot themselves in the foot. We will never get economic policies that favor the working and middle classes without strictly limiting immigration, and ending things like birthright citizenship. Canada can kinda have because we’re their buffer (they flipped out about getting 50,000 asylum seekers. Meanwhile there were points where we get that in a month). And then, I mean.. the rest of the countries im the New World that have it are also countries where people migrate [i]from[/i] to the U.S. This should be priority day one, end via executive order and let it go through the courts. At least TRY. If it ends up needing a constitutional amendment then that’s that. But at least TRY. because it’s ridiculous. Most “mixed status families) where there’s all this fear mongering about deportation—is due to birthright citizenship. Anyone with a brain can see the ridiculousness of “oh we can’t end TPS because they’ve built lives here”, “oh we cant deport families because some of them are citizens”, “oh we cant deport people who have bought houses and built businesses” ALLMOF THESE THINGS ARE BECAUSE OUR LAWS ENCOURAGE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION! Lets not give citizenship to kids of parents who have no right to be here,lets not encourage home loans to undocumented individuals, lets not continuously expand “temporary” to mean decades. It’s just ridiculous.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics